If supervision is to exchange information from a monitoring meeting, it should first discuss it with supervision, but this may not always be possible in the event of immediate security issues. What else can a monitoring agreement contain? Participants negotiate the terms of the agreement with regard to: research monitoring agreements between researchers and researchers are an imperative requirement of the university research committee. All HDR candidates are expected to enter into a monitoring agreement within the first four weeks of the start of their research. The monitoring agreement should be reviewed and amended on a regular basis if things change. Formal decisions on the processing of files must be recorded in the records management system. Decide who will do it in the surveillance contract. The monitoring agreement is the written document detailing how participants cooperate to achieve mutually agreed objectives. To ensure that all HDR candidates have supervisory agreements, the confirmation procedure requires all HDR candidates to have submitted a supervisory agreement before the university confirms its application. Most faculties offer models of agreements on their websites. The Graduate Academy also offers a sample according to the guidelines of the DFG: GA Sample Supervision Agreement (Word) GA Sample Supervision Agreement (PDF) “I am well prepared for supervision and am fully engaged in the monitoring process in accordance with the Oranga Tamariki supervision procedure.” Use this model to develop your monitoring agreement What should a monitoring agreement contain at least? Participants should follow these five phases (based on mastering social supervision, Jane Wonnacott, 2012) in their discussions while forging their relationship. The final product of this process is the monitoring agreement.
Surveillance is never standardized; each doctoral student has individual needs and requirements. To what extent supervision is required, what appropriate forms of control and what rights and obligations are defined and refined in the relationship between PhD students and their superiors. It is best to specify this relationship in writing at the beginning of the promotion and to return to it during the promotion and, if necessary, to review that definition. This monitoring agreement may include specific traditions of an area of expertise and individual specifications for each doctoral student (. B for example, family obligations, professional life). These agreements allow for regular and mandatory long-term monitoring meetings. In addition, concrete expectations can be planned for these meetings. These agreements can also be terminated as part of a transparent process. At the FSU, written monitoring agreements are required to allow a faculty to host a Doctoral student. Ideally, the initial monitoring agreement should be reviewed after three months and, subsequently, each year. Surveillance interviews are considered confidential, with the exception of practice safety issues.
The monitoring agreement should include an agreed procedure for managing the exchange of information. Candidates and facilitators should discuss how they intend to achieve their research partnership and how each party intends to meet the project`s expectations, resources and others, and the decisions they make in the agreement. Among the themes discussed in the surveillance contract: “The prudential relationship is underpinned by the development of a relationship of trust, respect and openness, in which “one can take risks, innovate, meet challenges and improve development”. The search monitoring agreement is available in the “First Steps” section on the HDR Forms and Policy website. “The ability to establish and maintain the supervisory relationship is an essential requirement of a supervisor.”