If more than one document is part of a contract (i.e. from a calendar), the risk of conflict between multiple documents is created. One calendar might say one thing, and the other calendar might say another. Specific terms also have more weight than general terms. Some concepts generally prevail over general notions, as they are considered a specific exception to the general terms. If z.B Clause A states in your scenario: a written notification must be made at least five days before (each) change… (omitting “at the price”), Clause B would predominate because it would be more specific than the more general term (A) which, in my scene, would refer to any change of any kind (this assumes that the whole agreement did not highlight the problems more fully). Priority clauses are intended to reduce or eliminate ambiguities in the event of a conflict. It lists the order of precedence between the different clauses. If the two conditions are indeed contradictory, they will reject each other and either the court will fill the void with a reasonable period of time, or the court will cancel the entire contract if it is not possible to terminate the clause in a fair or reasonable manner. Assuming that this analysis does not work to resolve the problem, the court would check whether there is a precedence clause that is a clause that defines the parts of the contract / The types of clauses that predominate over others (for example. B, written requirements take advance information on performance requirements, addendum matters less than signed agreement, switch plans less than addendum, and so on).
It is a hypothetical scenario, but I hope it is appropriate for this board of directors. Suppose two people enter into a contract with clause A and clause B. Suppose also that these two are not generally contradictory, but that they conflict in a given scenario. What would happen? Using Nigeria`s legal system as an example, the court tends to view nigeria in a timely manner as an amendment or modification of the earlier clause. Within the National Audit Council against